Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson Sr. v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson Sr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Devin Hoover, U.M.MS. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson Sr. v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson Sr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Devin Hoover, U.M.MS. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Hoover
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoover v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hoover
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hoover v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv05888
Plaintiff:
Rhonda K. Hoover
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hoover v. 4 Seasons Motors Inc.
as 2:2021cv04177
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hoover
Defendant:
4 Seasons Motors Inc. and Samer Pharra
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1989
Hoffmeyer v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Aramark Inc., Sergeant Hillis, Captain Frisby and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffmeyer v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00752
Defendant:
DRC Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Harris, Mr. Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Hoover et al
as 1:2020cv00751
Defendant:
John H. Hoover, Ashley Bretland, Officer Danny Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
William Blair, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.