Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Hopper et al v. Weygand et al
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper and Deanna-Lyn Dale
Defendant:
Jordan Weygand, Robert Glasby, Steven Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward (PS) v. Armijo et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Demontray Ward and Demontray Larell Ward
Defendant:
A. Armijo, Avery, T. Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. County of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper
Defendant:
County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Hopper et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
M. Scott Montgomery
Defendant:
Ronnie Hopper and Sharon Hopper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Hopper v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2023cv00516
Petitioner:
Keith Dewane Hopper
Respondent:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company v. O'Callaghan et al
as 4:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Frances O'Callaghan and Jacob Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hopper v. Nix et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Keith D Hopper
Defendant:
Ashley Nix, Tanya Wilson, Loretta Radford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevillion vs. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00473
Defendant:
Jeff Trevillion, Scott Owen, James Wathen, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopper v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
Polly Hopper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
