Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington (PS) et al v. Black Hawk County Sheriff
as 1:2023cv02329
Plaintiff:
C.S. Washington and Nanette Horton
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina, et al v. McIff Allen, et al
as 23-4057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN HEPIKIYA MEDINA, JUSTIN HORTON, MADELAINE THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE ANNE MARIE MCIFF ALLEN, THE HONORABLE JEREMIAH HUMES, THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE JOHNSON and others
Horton v. Navajo Technical University et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
John Horton
Defendant:
Navajo Technical University and Lucas B. Babycos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mares v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jake Mares
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Vincent Horton, Ronald Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina et al v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hepikiya Medina, Justin Horton, Madelaine Thompson and others
Defendant:
Anne Marie McIff Allen, Jeremiah Humes, Judge Christine Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Axtell v. Palomo et al
as 1:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Austyn Onstott, V. Harrel, M. Deleon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Axtell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanluven-Malloy v. Correctional Medical Group Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03198
Defendant:
Jamie (I) Miller, Tammy Garrett, Shauri Kron and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Vanluven-Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.