Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent:
Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner:
Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Horton v. Watts
as 1:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Tavon James Horton
Defendant:
Gail Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bryant E. Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Darius Horton, Express Funeral Funding, Hartford, The Hartford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCann-McCalpine v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02195
Plaintiff:
Lydon McCann-McCalpine
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Lt McElligott, Sgt Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes-Rodriguez v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02661
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Fuentes-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ibrahim v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02529
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Faruk Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kourouma v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02538
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Falaye Kourouma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cuhna v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02539
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Abalo Cuhna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Campos-Garcia v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02537
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Campos-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
