Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Carnell v. Myers Sr. et al
as 7:2017cv07693
Plaintiff:
Robert Carnell
Defendant:
Gene G. Myers, Sr., Thomas Fortune, Howard A. Zucker, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sunnen, MD v. New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) et al
as 1:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Gerard Sunnen, MD
Defendant:
New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) and Dr. Howard A. Zucker, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lamb v. Cuomo
as 17-144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deborah Lamb, pro se and John Mecca, pro se as Sovereign People of the United States
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, the Governor for N.Y.S., Howard A. Zucker, the Public Health Commissioner for N.Y.S., Eric T. Schneiderman, the Attorney General for N.Y.S. and others
Defendant:
John Doe(s), #1-20
Lamb et al v. Cuomo et al
as 2:2016cv06568
Defendant:
Steven Bellone, County of Suffolk, Annmarie Csorny and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lamb and John Mecca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NM v. Hebrew Academy Long Beach Beach et al
as 2:2015cv07004
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Elia, Richard Hagler, Hebrew Academy Long Beach Beach and others
Plaintiff:
NM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B.S. et al v. Clarkstown Central School District et al
as 7:2015cv07262
Plaintiff:
B.S.
Defendant:
Clarkstown Central School District , Maryellen Elia and Howard M. Zucker, MD, JD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin v. CED-Child Support Enforcement Section et al
as 1:2015cv07249
Plaintiff:
Mark Marvin
Defendant:
CED-Child Support Enforcement Section, Support Collection Unit, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Hanley v. Zucker et al
as 1:2015cv05958
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hanley and Alan Blumkin
Defendant:
Howard A. Zucker and Steven Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
