Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Montgomery v. Gamble et al
as 3:2013cv00430
Defendant:
Matthew David Gamble, Howard Prince and Seth Smith
Plaintiff:
Ernest Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Laneheart v. Howard Prince
as 13-30706
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY LANEHEART
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, Warden
Smith v. Prince et al
as 2:2013cv02525
Plaintiff:
Theodore Scott Smith
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Mitchell v. Howard Prince
as 13-30471
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, Warden
Wetzel v. Prince et al
as 3:2013cv00228
Defendant:
Howard Prince, Unknown E M T and Unknown Preacher
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Prince et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Howard Prince
Petitioner:
Michael F. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Prince et al
as 2:2013cv00437
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Davis v. Howard Prince
as 13-30127
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, Warden, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Andrew Wetzel v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections, et al
as 13-30056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOBBY JINDAL, Governor, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections and others
Parent v. Prince et al
as 2:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Craig Parent
Defendant:
Howard Prince and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
