Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Seay, et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, et al
as 21-6054
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA CRAIG, R.D.H., Hygiene Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JAMES A. SPARKS, D.D.S., individually and President of District 5 of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JEFF LUNDAY, D.D.S., individually and 2nd Vice President of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SEAY, D.D.S., MS and LOIS JACOBS, D.D.S., MS
Seay et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry et al
as 5:2020cv00915
Defendant:
Michael Howl, Bobby Carmen, James Gore and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Seay and Lois Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay, et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, et al
as 20-6072
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA CRAIG, R.D.H., Hygiene Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JAMES A. SPARKS, D.D.S., Individually and President of District 5 of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JEFF LUNDAY, D.D.S., Individually and 2nd Vice President of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SEAY, D.D.S., MS and LOIS JACOBS, D.D.S., MS
Seay et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry et al
as 5:2017cv00682
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Seay and Lois Jacobs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Susan Rogers, Audrey Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howl v. Alvarado
as 2:2017cv00380
Plaintiff:
David G. Howl
Defendant:
Noe J. Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WP Howle Masonry Contractor Inc v. Grahams Construction Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
WP Howle Masonry Contractor Inc
Defendant:
Grahams Construction Inc and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Electro Mechanical v. Riter Engineering et al
as 2:2010cv00975
Plaintiff:
Electro Mechanical
Defendant:
Riter Engineering and Bryan Howles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
