Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cisneros Portillo et al v. New Ko-Sushi Japanese Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02429
Plaintiff:
Miguel Cisneros Portillo , Cesar Tenorio , Eugenio Ortega Vasquez and others
Defendant:
New Ko-Sushi Japanese Restaurant, Inc., New Ko Sushi II Japanese Restaurant Inc., Hui Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shen et al v. Number One Fresco Tortillas, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02015
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation, Dan Qing Liu, Jian Hui Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Shen, Junmin Shen and Yuzhu Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Chan et al v. Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc.
as 1:2015cv09605
Plaintiff:
Lai Chan , Hui Chen and Xue Xie
Defendant:
Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Hidalgo et al v. Ichiro Sushi, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00414
Plaintiff:
Roberto Hidalgo
Defendant:
Ichiro Sushi, Inc. and Hui Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv00124
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Busheng Wang, Chang Guo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Pennymac Holdings LLC v. Lin Hui Chen et al
as 2:2014cv06993
Defendant:
Lin Hui Chen, Yin Chew and Does
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings LLC
Zalloum v. Chen et al
as 5:2014cv00418
Plaintiff:
Dalya Zalloum
Defendant:
Mei Hui Chen, Triple Li & J Asian Food, Inc. and Triple Li of Ocala, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Chen v. Holder
as 14-2471
Petitioner:
Bi Hui Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
