Cases 21 - 29 of 29
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01585
Plaintiff:
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01195
Plaintiff:
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00389
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Defendant:
Immunex Corporation and Amgen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0146 Review of Board of Patent Appeals Decision
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES V GENENTECH
as 09-1182
Defendant-Appellee:
Genentech, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
HUMAN GENOME V IMMUNEX
as 08-1418
Defendant-Appellee:
Amgen, Inc. and Immunex Corporation
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
as 1:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Defendant:
Genentech Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00780
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Defendant:
Immunex Corp. and Amgen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0146 Review of Board of Patent Appeals Decision
Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00526
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences Inc. and Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen Inc. and Immunex Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0146 Review of Board of Patent Appeals Decision
Tafas v. Dudas et al
as 1:2007cv00846
Plaintiff:
Triantafyllos Tafas and Triantafyllos Tafas
Defendant:
Jon Dudas and The United States Patent and Trademark Office
Amicu:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
