Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al
as 2:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Dario Rodriguez v. E.K. McDaniels, et al
as 20-17045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, MERCADO, CRITICAL RESISTANCE, from member case 3:16-cv-609 and others
Index Newspapers LLC, et al v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 20-35739
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUSTIN YAU, and those similarly situated, ALEX MILAN TRACY, BRIAN CONLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; and JOHN DOES, 1-60; individual and supervisory officers of Portland Police Bureau and other agencies working in concert,
Amicus Curiae:
THE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH AND REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AND 14 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
Open Technology Fund, et al v. Michael Pack
as 20-5195
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Pack, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Director of the U.S. Agency for Global Media
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ryan C. Crocker, Ambassador, Open Technology Fund, Michael W. Kempner and others
Amicus Curiae:
Human Rights Watch, Free Press, The Center for Democracy and Technology and others
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv03265
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv03263
Plaintiff:
American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Citizenship Immigration Services and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2020cv03266
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv01001
Not Classified By Court:
IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS
as 20-1191
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD GRENELL, in his official capacity as acting Director of National Intelligence, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/ CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, PEN AMERICAN CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
