Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Humphrey v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Ronald Humphrey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hall v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Defendant:
Charles Humphrey, G.W. Noble Trucking, LLC, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Mikaila Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Humphrey v. USP - Hazelton Warden
as 5:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Tony Andre Humphrey
Respondent:
USP - Hazelton Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Godlove v. Humphrey Management, et al et al
as 3:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Beth Hooper, Stephen Nehrt, Tom Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Godlove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saunders v. Raleigh County et al
as 5:2020cv00221
Defendant:
Charles R. Humphreys, The Honorable Adam Dimlich, T A Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Rayco Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00614
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hugler v. Superior Steam Cleaning and Sandblasting, et.al.
as 5:2017cv01420
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Superior Steam Cleaning and Sandblasting and Douglas Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Humphreys et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv12323
Plaintiff:
Judy Humphreys and Frank Humphreys
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphreys v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv11213
Plaintiff:
Glenda Humphreys
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
