Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Neaves v. Hampton et al
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Constance O Neaves
Defendant:
Tony Hampton, Steve Quire, E. Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphries v. USA
as 5:2020cv00214
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Chad Steven Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bholat et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Bholat , Kevin Anderson , James P. Primm and others
Defendant:
City of Paris, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Paris, City of et al
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Williams
Defendant:
City of Paris , David Thompson and Jon L. Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West v. City of Paris et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Mark West
Defendant:
City of Paris, Paris Police Department, Michael Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphries v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Kim Humphries
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Humphries v. Farmers Capital Bank Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Alvin Humphries
Defendant:
Farmers Capital Bank Corporation and Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Albury et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC, et al
as 3:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Angela Albury , Cassi Allen , Katrina Allen and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc. , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
