Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Hunter v. Village of Ripley
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Owen Hunter
Defendant:
Village of Ripley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hunter v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65060
Plaintiff:
Julia Hunter
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hunter v. Lucas County et al.
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Olivia Hunter
Defendant:
Lucas County, Correction Center of Northwest Ohio, Corrections Commission of Northwest Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimica D Phelps
Defendant:
Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tonya Ann Hunter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hunter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023oe04191
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hunter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04192
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hunter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04191
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
