Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Santiago Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 14-14611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE), Field Office Director, ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF DETENTION AND REMOVAL, ATLANTA DISTRICT, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) and others
Ice v. Shirk et al
as 3:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L. Ice
Defendant:
Matthew Shirk and Ron Mallett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv80974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2013cv21286
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alvarez
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement , United States Attorney, Unidentified Officials and/or Agents of Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv60031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
