Cases 1 - 10 of 27
IGT, a Nevada Corporation et al v. Acres
as 2:2022cv02134
Plaintiff:
IGT, a Nevada Corporation and Acres Gaming Incorporated, A Nevada Corporation
Counter Claimant:
John F Acres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Acres 4.0 v. IGT
as 2:2021cv01962
Plaintiff:
Acres 4.0, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
IGT
Counter Defendant:
Acres 4.0 and acres manufacturing company
Defendant:
John F Acres
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Precedent Gaming, Inc. v. IGT et al
as 3:2019cv00257
Plaintiff:
Precedent Gaming, Inc.
Defendant:
Action Gaming, Inc. and IGT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Davis v. City of Las Vegas, NV et al
as 2:2018cv01613
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas, NV and IGT
Plaintiff:
Marlena Davis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benson v. Double Down Interactive, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00525
Defendant:
International Game Technology, Double Down Interactive, LLC, Double Down Interactive LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Benson and Mary Simonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
IGT v. Scrappy Elegant Gaming, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02532
Plaintiff:
IGT
Defendant:
Jamie Leigh Klingler, Darryl Rosenblatt and Scrappy Elegant Gaming, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cornele Overstreet v. IGT
as 17-16592
Petitioner - Appellant:
CORNELE A. OVERSTREET, Regional Director of the Twenty-Eighth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellee:
IGT, DBA International Game Technology
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
