Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00295
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Indiana State of v. Biden et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana and Indiana State of
Defendant:
Joe R Biden, Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CARDENAS et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
CRISTHIAN HERRERA CARDENAS, MARIBEL XIRUM, JAVIER JAIMES JAIMES and others
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE), U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RIVADENEIRA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2015cv00911
CDF:
ALL THE CONTRACT DETENTION FACILITIES
IGSA:
ALL THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FACILITIES
SPC:
ALL THE SERVICE PROCESSING CENTERS
Defendant:
ALL THE WARDEN OF THE JAIL AND DETENTION CENTERS CONTRACTED BY ICE, CHIEF OPERATOR OF THE DETENTION OPERATION MANUAL and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
DHS:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
ICE:
DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff:
FELIX GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JIMENEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01582
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JIMENEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNKNOWN AGENT(S) OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
MARFARLAN v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2009cv00158
Petitioner:
RAFAEL CHAPOTIN MARFARLAN
Respondent:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUHASEY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
