Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-16864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Appellee:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Mauney et al v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Sidney William Mauney and Carolyn Armstrong Mauney
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Atlas Foundry Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Murphy et al v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv10475
Plaintiff:
Tricia Jean Murphy and Sandra L Wood
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Durabla Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Polson v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10002
Plaintiff:
Paul Polson
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc, Owens Illinois Glass Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
