Cases 11 - 17 of 17
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 4:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Indiana Autobody Association, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06001
Plaintiff:
Neary Collision, Inc., Southlake Collision Center, Inc., Excel Auto Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State Farm General Insurance Company, Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, Progressive American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
INDIANA AUTOBODY ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv00507
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
CROSS PAINT & BODY SHOP, INCORPORATED, DAN T. GRATZ BODY SHOP, INC., DECKER & VICKERY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BROWDER v. INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2010cv01269
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE BROWDER
Defendant:
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
