Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Brooks-Ngwenya v. Mind Trust The et al
as 1:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela E Brooks-Ngwenya
Defendant:
Mind Trust The, United Way of Central Indiana, Central Indiana Education Alliance and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FLYNN v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2015cv01245
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CAULDWELL, MARVEDA DUNKARD and INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Plaintiff:
SHELLINDA CARGILE FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
MATHES v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOL
as 1:2014cv00424
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOL
Plaintiff:
MAKALA MATHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
