Cases 41 - 50 of 58
BROOKS-NGWENYA v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
ANGELA ETHEL BROOKS-NGWENYA
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
D.Y. v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv01241
Defendant:
DEBRA BARLOWE, BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
D. Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
C. v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
as 1:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
J. C.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
