Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10502
Plaintiff:
Michael Magik Jones
Defendant:
MDOC, People of the State of Michigan and Ingham County Jail
Hartwell v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Office et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Willie Lamar Hartwell
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Office and Ingham County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Nettles v. Ingham County Jail
as 22-1067
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT NETTLES
Respondent / Appellee:
INGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Uraz #114653 v. Ingham County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00550
Plaintiff:
Tunc Uraz #114653 and Tony Uraz
Defendant:
Sam Davis, Ingham County Jail, Gene Wriggelsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamburino #268269 v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01100
Defendant:
Susan Melton, James Hughs, Ingham County Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deas v. Ingham County Jail
as 1:2018cv00838
Plaintiff:
Deandrae R. Deas
Defendant:
Ingham County Jail and Ingham, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Ingham County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv00839
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #1, C. Hagerman and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall #161291 et al v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2018cv00763
Defendant:
Ingham County Jail and Scott Wriggelsworth
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gallegos #66091 and Leroy Hall #161291, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klotz et al v. Ingham County Jail
as 1:2017cv00608
Plaintiff:
Terry Lin Klotz, Moreno Lee Jackson and Jamel Graham
Defendant:
Ingham County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
