Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
OM HOSPITALITY DUBOIS, LLC. v. ROSE CONSTRUCTION AHMAD, INC., et al.
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
OM HOSPITALITY DUBOIS, LLC. doing business as HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS & SUITES
Defendant:
ROSE CONSTRUCTION AHMAD, INC. and AHMAD MOHAMMADPOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01574
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KINNARD v. COMFORT INN et al
as 2:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
CARLA KINNARD
Defendant:
COMFORT INN and CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
TIMKO et al v. NSPA LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01307
Defendant:
YADWINDER SINGH, BALJINDER KAUR, HIMANSHU BHATIA and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI TIMKO, ANTHONY ROBINSON and STEPHANIE DARNELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
