Cases 1 - 10 of 13
u-blox AG et al v. InterDigital, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
u-blox AG, u-blox San Diego, Inc. and u-blox America, Inc.
Defendant:
InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital Communications, Inc., InterDigital Technology Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
InterDigital Technology Corporation et al v. Lenovo Holding Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01590
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo Holding Company Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital Holdings, Inc., IPR Licensing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
U-Blox AG et al v. Interdigital, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Interdigital Technology Corporation, Interdigital Holdings, Inc., Interdigital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
U-Blox AG, U-Blox San Diego, Inc. and U-Blox America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
U-Blox AG et al v. Interdigital, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02912
Defendant:
Interdigital Technology Corporation, Interdigital Holdings, Inc., Interdigital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
U-Blox AG, U-Blox San Diego, Inc. and U-Blox America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
InterDigital Communications Inc. et al v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
InterDigital Communications Inc. , Interdigital Technology Corporation , IPR Licensing Inc. and others
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. , Futurewei Technologies Inc. and Huawei Device USA Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Huawei Device USA Inc. , Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and Futurewei Technologies Inc.
Counter_defendant:
IPR Licensing Inc. , InterDigital Communications Inc. , InterDigital Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
InterDigital Communications Inc. et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
InterDigital Communications Inc. , Interdigital Technology Corporation , IPR Licensing Inc. and others
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
Counter_claimant:
ZTE (USA) Inc.
Counter_defendant:
IPR Licensing Inc. , InterDigital Communications Inc. , InterDigital Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
InterDigital Communications Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
InterDigital Communications Inc. , Interdigital Technology Corporation , IPR Licensing Inc. and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
InterDigital Communications Inc. et al v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
InterDigital Communications Inc. , Interdigital Technology Corporation , IPR Licensing Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Interdigital Communications LLC et al v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Interdigital Communications LLC , Interdigital Technology Corporation and IPR Licensing Inc.
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Futurewei Technologies Inc., Nokia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 5:2011cv01846
Not Yet Classified:
Third Party Sony Mobile Communications USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Non-Party Rovi Corp. and others
Petitioner:
InterDigital Technology Corporation, S3G Graphics Co. LTD., InterDigital Communications LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cellco Partnership and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Interested Party:
Siemens AG and Microsoft Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
HTC Corporation
Intervenor:
Research In Motion Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
