Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Franklin et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tina Shontele Franklin and Troy R. Franklin
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CICAS IP LLC v. Olympus Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
CICAS IP LLC
Defendant:
Olympus Corporation and Olympus America Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CICAS IP LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
CICAS IP LLC
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Phillips et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
De Lois Phillips, Amy Leanne Phillips, Laura Kylene Sublett and others
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Byrum et al v. Intuitive Surgical Inc
as 3:2021cv02305
Plaintiff:
Sue Byrum and Curtis Byrum
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McWilliams et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00132
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Britney McWilliams and Brice McWilliams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pohly v. Intuitive Surgical Inc
as 3:2016mc00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Pohly
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Pohly v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02491
Plaintiff:
Richard Pohly
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Respondent:
CLAUS ROEHRBORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreno v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00399
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deborah Linda Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Clement v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06189
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Clement
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
