Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Garcia v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv03062
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Petitioner:
Irvine Villegas Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Begay v. USA
as 3:2024cv08024
Petitioner:
Randly Irvin Begay and Randly Begay
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sanders v. Fitness International LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Reginald Sanders
Defendant:
Fitness International LLC Mesa, Arizona facility doing business as Esporta Fitness and Fitness International LLC Irvine, CA facility doing business as Esporta Fitness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kraft v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Michael Reese, Jonathan S Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Anglin v. USA
as 2:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Irvin Donavan Anglin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00001
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kraft v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv01491
Defendant:
M Reese, Queen E Land LLC, Daniel Tovar and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Irvine v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv01086
Plaintiff:
Crystal Irvine
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blevins et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Irvin G Blevins and Carolyn Blevins
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cady v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03099
Plaintiff:
Irvin Cady
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
