Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Isiah Hill v. ADOC, et al
as 22-15216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, named as State Department of AZ Correction, CHARLES L. RYAN, Named as Former Director, C. Ryan, Sued Official/Individual, SLADE, C.O. #1777, Sued Official/Individual and others
Isiah Hill v. ADOC, et al
as 21-16486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, named as State Department of AZ Correction, CHARLES L. RYAN, Named as Former Director, C. Ryan, Sued Official/Individual, SLADE, C.O. #1777, Sued Official/Individual and others
Isiah Hill v. ADOC, et al
as 21-15470
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, GARRETT M. HYLE, B. DEFEO, #6855, Sued Official/Individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Isiah Hill v. Jeffrey Van Winkle
as 20-72779
Respondent:
JEFFREY VAN WINKLE
Petitioner:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Hill v. Van Winkle
as 2:2020cv01664
Respondent:
Unknown Van Winkle
Petitioner:
Isiah Romont Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Isiah Hill v. ADOC
as 20-15192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hill v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2019cv05693
Plaintiff:
Isiah Romont Hill
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Isiah Hill v. William White, et al
as 19-15789
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM WHITE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01899
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Isiah Hill v. Maricopa County Attorney's Of, et al
as 14-16154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PETER SPAW, Bar ID #005331, KATHLEEN M. TRACY, Bar ID #023849 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
