Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rodriguez v. URS Midwest, Inc., et al.
as 24-2969
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
URS MIDWEST, INC. and UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC.
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2760
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2418
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER, formerly known as Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON, Acting through and doing business as The Washington Health Care Authority
Rodriguez v. URS Midwest, Inc., et al.
as 24-1518
Respondent:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as an aggrieved employee pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Petitioner:
URS MIDWEST, INC., a Delaware corporation and UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation
USA v. Roberto Rodriguez
as 20-40013
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERTO ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sepulveda-Medina v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 19-1052
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO VELEZ-MARTINEZ, NAYDA ROSA ALVAREZ-MORALES, ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ-VELAZQUEZ and others
Defendant:
ISLAND FINANCE CORPORATION, COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CREDITO DE CIALES, ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSETS COMPANY I and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OPERATING PARTNERS COMPANY, LLC., UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE MANUEL SEPULVEDA-MEDINA
USA v. Rodriguez Villareal et al
as 2:2017mj02394
Defendant:
Luis Israel Rodriguez Villareal (1) and Perla Penaloza de Patron (2)
Plaintiff:
USA
Luis Israel Rodriguez Villareal
as 2:2017mj02394
Defendant:
Luis Israel Rodriguez Villareal (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
US v. Rodriguez-Zaya
as 15-2394
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ-ZAYAS, a/k/a Raelo, a/k/a Sangre, a/k/a Vampiro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
