Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Derek LeClaire v. Charles Fischer, et al
as 19-3468
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles LeCompte, Chief of Police CRST, Marvin Lecompte, IT Supervisor IHS and Charles L. Fischer, CEO of IHS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derek L. LeClaire, Police Officer of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Raymond Semler, et al v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 16-4043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raymond Leon Semler and Paul J. Knutson
Defendant - Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, Former Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Dennis Benson, Chief Executive Officer of Minnesota Sex Offender Program-MSOP, Daniel Storkamp, MSOP Deputy Director and others
Allen Pyron v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 11-2847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Allen Pyron
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Kunshier and Alvin Lamm
Defendant - Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Dennis Benson, Chief Executive Officer of Minnesota Sex Offender Program - MSOP, Daniel Storkamp, MSOP Deputy Director and others
Robert A. Kunshier, et al v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 11-2845
Plaintiff:
Allen Pyron
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert A. Kunshier and Alvin Lamm
Defendant - Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Dennis Benson, Chief Executive Officer of Minnesota Sex Offender Program - MSOP, Daniel Storkamp, MSOP Deputy Director and others
Shannon D. Hollie v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 11-2843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shannon D. Hollie
Defendant - Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Dennis Benson, Chief Executive Officer of Minnesota Sex Offender Program - MSOP, Daniel Storkamp, MSOP Deputy Director and others
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, Donna Zickefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
