Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cavanaugh v. ITT Educational Services Incorporated
as 4:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
William Cavanaugh
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CFPB v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 15-1761
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant - Appellant:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-20617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amy Collins v. ITT Education Services Incorpo
as 13-80179
Plaintiff - Respondent:
AMY COLLINS, an individual on behalf of herself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation conducting business in the State of California
Debra Leveski, et al v. ITT Educational Services, Inc
as 12-2891
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LEVESKI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. MATUSHESKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Timothy J. Matusheski v. ITT Educational Services, Inc
as 12-2008
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LEVESKI
Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. MATUSHESKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Debra Leveski, et al v. ITT Educational Services, Inc
as 12-1979
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LEVESKI
Appellant:
PLEWS SHADLEY RACHER & BRAUN LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Motley Rice LLP, et al v. ITT Educational Services, Inc
as 12-1967
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LEVESKI
Appellant:
MOTLEY RICE LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Debra Leveski v. ITT Educational Services, Inc
as 12-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA LEVESKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
