Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Mendez v. Doe
as 14-4005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, Doctor at a clinic in Logan Utah
Mendez v. United Nations
as 2:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lopez Mendez
Defendant:
United Nations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. One of the Connected, et al
as 12-2194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE OF THE CONNECTED WIRED MEMBERS OF A BIG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, CONNECTED, WIRED MEMBER THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and CONNECTED, WIRED SOLDIERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. One of the Conected [sic] Wire, et al
as 12-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE OF THE CONNECTED WIRED MEMBERS OF A BIG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, CONECTED [SIC], WIRED MEMBER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONECTED [SIC], WIRED SOLDIERS
Mendez v. Doe
as 11-4107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN 1 DOE, and this criminal organization
Mendez v. One Of The Connected Wired Mem, et al
as 10-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE OF THE CONNECTED WIRED MEMBERS OF A BIG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION and WIRED MEMBERS OF A BIG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
Mendez v. One Of The Connected
as 10-1386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE OF THE CONNECTED WIRED MEMBERS OF A BIG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
Mendez v. The National Railroads Of Mexi
as 10-2145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
THE NATIONAL RAILROADS OF MEXICO
Mendez v. No Named Defendant
as 10-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
