Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Big Sky Scientific LLC v. Idaho State Police et al
as 1:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Ada County, Jan M Bennetts and Idaho State Police
Plaintiff:
Big Sky Scientific LLC
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Hemp Roundtable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Castillo v. Klitch et al
as 1:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jose Castillo
Defendant:
Justin Klitch, Christopher Cottrell and Idaho State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Dustin Walton
Defendant:
Marcileno Gonzalez, Daryl Goard, Heidi Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Idaho State Police et al
as 1:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jarrod E Bush
Defendant:
Idaho State Police, Justin Klitch, Corey Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana Smith v. USDC-IDB
as 14-71985
:
In re: DANA LYDELL SMITH
Petitioner:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, MINIDOKA COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Roseen v. Idaho State Police et al
as 1:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Darien E. Roseen
Defendant:
Idaho State Police , Fruitland City Police Department , Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Macy v. Dan Howard, et al
as 13-35992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK MARION MACY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN HOWARD, Master Corporal at Idaho State Police, SEAN LIND, Master Corporal at Idaho State Police, GREG BOWER, Prosecutor Ada County and others
Rice II v. City of Boise City et al
as 1:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Lee Arthur Rice II
Defendant:
City of Boise City, County of Ada, City of Meridian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
