Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Renken v. The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority
as 1:2022cv05193
Plaintiff:
Toni Renken
Defendant:
The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jeffrey D. Cochran v. Illinois State Toll Highway, et al
as 15-2689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. COCHRAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, TERRENCE D'ARCY, JEFFREY REDICK and others
Midwest Fence Corporation v. TRAN, et al
as 15-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIDWEST FENCE CORPORATION, A Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and others
Cochran v. Illinois State Toll Highway Authority et al
as 1:2014cv09145
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Cochran
Defendant:
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority , Paula Wolff , James J Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv50100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cochran v. Illinois State Toll Highway Authority et al
as 5:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Cochran
Defendant:
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, Paula Wolff, James J. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
