Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
Roy v. Illumina, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02327
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Illumina, Inc., Francis A. Desouza and John Thompson
Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension & Relief Fund v. Illumina, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension & Relief Fund
Defendant:
Illumina, Inc., Francis A. Desouza, John Thompson and others
Kangas v. Illumina, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
Leslie Kangas
Defendant:
Illumina, Inc., Francis A. Desouza and John Thompson
Federal Trade Commission v. Illumina Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00800
Defendant:
Illumina Inc. and GRAIL, INC.
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
McLeod v. Illumina, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
James McLeod
Defendant:
Illumina, Inc., Francis A. Desouza and Marc A. Stapley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Chen v. Illumina, Inc., et al.
as 3:2016cv03044
Plaintiff:
Yi Fan Chen and Frontline Global Trading Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Illumina, Inc., Francis A. Desouza and Marc A. Stapley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
The Scripps Research Institute v. Illumina, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
The Scripps Research Institute
Defendant:
Illumina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Illumina, Inc. et al v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. et al
as 3:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Illumina, Inc. , University of Washington and UAB Research Foundation
Defendant:
Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Interlabservice, OOO v. Illumina, Inc., et al.
as 3:2015cv02171
Plaintiff:
Interlabservice, OOO
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1 through 10
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Illumina, Inc., Illumina Netherlands, BV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
