Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Bird Home Automation GmbH
as 6:2022cv00622
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Bird Home Automation GmbH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Eyetalk365, LLC v. Bird Home Automation, LLC
as 3:2016cv00858
Plaintiff:
Eyetalk365, LLC
Defendant:
Bird Home Automation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Script Security Solutions L.L.C. v. Bot Home Automation Inc.
as 2:2016cv01401
Plaintiff:
Script Security Solutions L.L.C.
Defendant:
Bot Home Automation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eyetalk 365, LLC v. Bird Home Automation, LLC
as 3:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Eyetalk 365, LLC
Defendant:
Bird Home Automation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Control4 Corporation v. In-Home Automation
as 2:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
Control4 Corporation
Defendant:
In-Home Automation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Powerline Innovations, LLC v. Elk Products, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Powerline Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Elk Products, Inc., Home Automation Inc. , HomeSeer Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sipco, LLC v. Control4 Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
Sipco, LLC
Defendant:
Control4 Corporation, Digi International Inc., Home Automation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
First Impressions Design and Management, Inc. v. Magnahome, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv20196
Plaintiff:
First Impressions Design and Management, Inc. and First Impressions Design and Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Magnahome, LLC, Magna Home Automation, LLC and Javier Kletnicki
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Snyder v. Smartlabs, Inc.
as 0:2006cv60728
Defendant:
Smartlabs, Inc., Smarthome, Inc. and Home Automation Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stuart D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
