Cases 1 - 10 of 159
United States of America v. Samaniego-Iniguez
as 24-3295
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OSCAR MIGUEL SAMANIEGO-INIGUEZ
Iniguez v. Washburn
as 24-403
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL A. INIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SUE WASHBURN, SUPERINTENDENT
Iniguez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
Humberto Iniguez and Jessica Iniguez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Keller Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Dasilva et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Belmira Dasilva and Jose Iniguez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
(HC) Iniguez v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01890
Petitioner:
Jose Iniguez
Respondent:
Steven Smith and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iniguez v. Diaz Iron Works et al
as 7:2023cv05719
Plaintiff:
Edgar Iniguez
Defendant:
Diaz Iron Works and Carlos Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Iniguez v. Smith et al
as 2:2023at00876
Petitioner:
Jose Iniguez
Respondent:
Warden Steven Smith and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iniguez Aguilar v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00128
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Iniguez-Aguilar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Priscilla Iniguez et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv04947
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Iniguez and Herman Iniguez
Petitioner:
Kenneth C. Yeager
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshall Services and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Iniguez-Montes v. Garland
as 21-446
Petitioner:
EVA INIGUEZ-MONTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
