Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Bruce Koenig v. State of Maryland
as 10-6214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Plaintiff - None:
REGINALD S. TUCKER, MOHAMMAD BIGLARI and JAMES A. CALHOUN-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, GARY MAYNARD, Secretary and others
Tucker et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Reginald Tucker
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Gary Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker et al v. State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Biglari
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Gary Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker et al v. State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-El
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Gary Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2009cv03488
Plaintiff:
Reginald Tucker, James Calhoun-El, Mohammad Biglari and others
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Gary Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Layfield v. Inmate Grievance Office et al
as 8:2008cv01506
Plaintiff:
Chris Layfield
Defendant:
Inmate Grievance Office, DOC and L. Jackson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baylor v. Oakley et al
as 1:2007cv01569
Plaintiff:
Michael Anothny Baylor
Defendant:
Scott S. Oakley, John W. Hardwicke, Inmate Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01471
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
