Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Angela Cunliffe v. Jeffrey Wright, et al
as 16-1255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA CUNLIFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WRIGHT, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Principal of King Collect Preparatory High School, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, JAMES SULLIVAN, Director of Office of the Inspector General for the Board of Education and others
Kevin Sroga v. Ron Huberman, et al
as 15-1522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SROGA
Defendant - Appellee:
RON HUBERMAN, JUAN C. MICHEL, JAMES SULLIVAN and others
Ronald Grason v. State of Illinois Inspector Ge, et al
as 14-1667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD J. GRASON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS INSPECTOR GENERAL, JULIE HAMOS, Director of Healthcare & Family Services, BRAD HART, Director of Office of Inspector General and others
James Murray v. BOP, et al
as 13-1108
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY, also known as JAMES HINES
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES INSPECTOR GENERAL and SAMUEL SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Alonzo Fells v. Elijah R. Adams, et al
as 12-2839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO FELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
E. ADAMS, Trooper, OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE INSPECTOR GENERAL and WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Eugene Brown, Jr. v. Patrick Fitzgerald, et al
as 08-2778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE W. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. FITZGERALD, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Illinois, THOMAS P. WALSH, individually and in his capacity as Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief of Civil Division, H. JARRETT MARSHALL, individually and in his capacity as Counsel for the U.S. Dept. of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
