Cases 21 - 30 of 146
Lishneva v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Viktoriya Lishneva
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adell v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adell
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2021cv01872
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Davis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 6:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Installation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 8:2021cv02576
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Instillation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Leander Cooper
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogg v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
DeMorris Hogg
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
Cooper v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Leander Cooper
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bush v. Department of Human Relations and Social Services et al
as 2:2020cv00950
Plaintiff:
June Marquee Larun Bush and June Marques Bush
Defendant:
Department of Human Relations and Social Services and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
