Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James v. International Paper Company
as 1:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hope v. International Paper Company et al
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Clinton Hope
Defendant:
International Paper Company, Mike Closson and Jim Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY v. TWIN RIVERS LAND & TIMBER INC et al
as 1:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
International Paper Company
Defendant:
TWIN RIVERS LAND & TIMBER, INC., TWIN RIVERS COMPANY, INC., TWIN RIVERS LAND & TIMBER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Brazil v. TNT Railcar Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brazil
Defendant:
TNT Railcar Services, Inc., International Paper Company and Russell Matthew Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Gordon v. International Paper Company
as 4:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Albert Gordon
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv17076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
LOCKE v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY et al
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
WAYNE E. LOCKE and WAYNE E LOCKE
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
