Cases
Archdiocese of Washington v. WMATA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant: Archdiocese of Washington, Donald Cardinal Wuerl, a Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington, a corporation sole
Defendant - Appellee: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Paul J. Wiedefeld, in his official capacity as General Manager of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Ethics and Public Policy Center, First Liberty Institute, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and others
International Society for Kris v. Palmieri
as 16-4205
Plaintiff - Appellant: International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., Nikhil Gupta, AKA Nimai Pandit Das, Charles Lee, AKA Raja Vidya Das and others
Defendant - Appellee: Daniel Palmieri, as Justice of New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, Edward A. Maron, as Justice of New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, R. Bruce Cozzens, as Justice and Presiding Judge, Trial Assignment Part of New York Supreme Court, Nassau County and others
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. et al v. Palmieri et al
as 1:2016cv05924
Plaintiff: Braj Kishor Aggarwal, Benjamin Berwing, Balarama Das and others
Defendant: Hon. Bruce Cozzens, Edward Kelley, Hon. Roy S. Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. et al v. Palmieri et al
as 2:2016cv05924
Plaintiff: Braj Kishor Aggarwal, Benjamin Berwing, Balarama Das and others
Defendant: Hon. R. Bruce Cozzens, Edward Kelley, Hon. Daniel Roy Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. New Orleans City
as 2:2012cv00913
Plaintiff: International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
Defendant: New Orleans City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?