Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Central Pension Fund Of The International Union Of Operating Engineers And Participating Employees v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging Co.
as 3:2016cv00895
Plaintiff:
Central Pension Fund Of The International Union Of Operating Engineers And Participating Employees
Defendant:
Barnhart Crane and Rigging Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Foltz v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02487
Plaintiff:
Scott Foltz
Defendant:
Barnhart Crane and Rigging, Inc. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , International Union of Operating Engineers and others
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Welfare Plan of the International Union Operation Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees Local 1733 et al v. City of Memphis
as 2:2011cv02577
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees Local 1733 , Communications Workers of Amercia Local 3806 , Essica Littlejohn and others
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee;
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 917 v. ES&H, Inc
as 3:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 917
Defendant:
ES&H, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Southern Operators Health Fund et al v. Witt et al
as 3:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Southern Operators Health Fund, Russell Britt, Travis Simmons and others
Defendant:
Ronald Witt and International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 450
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
