Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Inventist Inc. v. Ninebot Inc. (USA)
as 24-1267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INVENTIST INC. and SHANE CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NINEBOT INC. (USA), dba Ninebot US Inc., NINEBOT (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and NINEBOT INC. (CHINA)
Inventist Inc. v. Ninebot Inc. (USA)
as 24-1010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INVENTIST INC. and SHANE CHEN
Defendant / Appellant:
NINEBOT INC. (USA), dba Ninebot US Inc., NINEBOT (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and NINEBOT INC. (CHINA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04393
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Inventist Inc v. eWheels LLC
as 3:2021cv05363
Defendant:
eWheels LLC
Plaintiff:
inventist, Inc. and Inventist Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Razor USA LLC v. ITC
as 21-1780
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
RAZOR USA LLC, SHANE CHEN and INVENTIST, INC.
First Wheel Management Limited v. Inventist, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
First Wheel Management Limited
Defendant:
Inventist, Inc. and Shane Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Inventist Inc
Defendant:
Ninebot Inc (USA), Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co Ltd and Ninebot Inc (China)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Inventist, Inc. v. Ninebot, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv05688
Plaintiff:
Inventist Inc
Defendant:
Ninebot Inc (USA), Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co Ltd and Ninebot Inc (China)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Powerboard, LLC v. Razor USA LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03749
Defendant:
Shane Chen, Inventist, Inc. and Razor USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Powerboard LLC
Segway Inc. et al v. Inventist, INC.
as 1:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
Segway Inc. , Deka Products Limited Partnership and Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co., LTD.
Defendant:
Inventist, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
