Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant:
ASHBEL T. WALL, Individually and Officially, C.O. GEOFF, Individually and Officially, CAPTAIN DUFFY, Individually and Officially and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, Individually and Officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, Individually and Officially, JACK WARD, Individually and Officially and others
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, individually and officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, individually and officially, JACK WARD, individually and officially and others
Defendant:
C.O. DEPHILLIPS, individually and officially, C.O. GEOFF, individually and officially, ASHBEL T. WALL, individually and officially and others
Neves v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, "Counselor" Franco, Deputy Warden Rui Diniz and others
Plaintiff:
Davante Neves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, Special Investigator Cabral, Jennifer Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2019cv00458
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Cloud, Investigator Cabral, Lieutenant Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Julio E. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Wall, et al
as 12-1977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, WARDEN WEEDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN COLLINS and others
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ACETO, CAPTAIN MCDONOUGH, LT. SAYLES and others
Lyons v. A.T. Wall, et al
as 10-2307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, JAMES WEEDEN, Warden, DEPUTY WARDEN COLLINS and others
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHANSON, Correctional Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
