Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd. v. iCAD, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08083
Defendant:
iCAD, Inc. and Invivo Corporation
Plaintiff:
Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
In re: NeuroGrafix ('360) Patent Litigation
as 1:2013md02432
Defendant:
St. Mary's Health Care System, Inc., The University of Chicago, Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GmbH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
In Re:
NeuroGrafix ('360) Patent Litigation
Consolidated Defendant:
Consolidated Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Neurografix et al v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv11065
Plaintiff:
Neurografix , Neurography Institute Medical Associates, Inc. and Image-Based Surgicenter Corporation
Defendant:
Philips Electronics North America Corporation , Philips Medical Systems, N.A., Inc. , Invivo Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Resonance Technology, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. et al
as 2:2008cv02580
Defendant:
Intermagnetics General Corporation, Invivo Corporation, Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. and others
Plaintiff:
Resonance Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
