Cases 1 - 10 of 1,809
Covial v. Francillion et al
as 1:2024cv03125
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Covial
Defendant:
Marvin Francillion, Ashley Duncan-Peters, Chris Budhan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Irving v. US Border Agency
as 1:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Kenarice Irving
Defendant:
US Border Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Irving v. US Border Agency
as 1:2024cv01488
Plaintiff:
Kenarice Irving
Defendant:
US Border Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Falkner v. Emerson
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Bertha Marie Falkner
Defendant:
Irving Emerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Saadeh v. Kagan
as 24-285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFIC SAADEH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KAGAN and JOSHUA KAGAN
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF IRVING KAGAN, by Its Administrator, Michael Kagan
Saadeh v. Kagan
as 24-245
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAFIC SAADEH
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF IRVING KAGAN, by Its Administrator, Michael Kagan and JOSHUA KAGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL KAGAN
Saadeh v. Kagan
as 24-163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAFIC SAADEH
Defendant:
MICHAEL KAGAN and THE ESTATE OF IRVING KAGAN, by Its Administrator, Michael Kagan
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA KAGAN
Irving Weinstein v. ATH Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Irving Weinstein
Defendant:
ATH HOLDINGS LLC, ATH NY CM LLC d/b/a ARTECHOUSE and ATH NY CM LLC doing business as Artechouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Leonard v. United States of America
as 24-64
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, COLLEN RICHARD and others
Garcia v. Singer
as 1:2023cv09414
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Garcia
Respondent:
PC Irving Singer
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
