Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Irving v. Haney et al
as 4:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving and Luke I Chrisco
Defendant:
Fullback Haney and Aaron Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving
Defendant:
John Doe, Postmaster General of U.S.A, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Pendergraft et al
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving and Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
James Pendergraft, Bradley Zumbragel, Angel Comiford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora-Nape v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01123
Petitioner:
Irving Edgar Mora-Nape
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Irving v. Hurtig et al
as 5:2020cv03181
Plaintiff:
David L. Irving, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer D. Landermilk, Becky C. Hurtig and Jennifer D. Laudermilk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. USA
as 6:2017cv00245
Petitioner:
Ronald Keith Irving
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ricks-Bey v. Miller, et al
as 16-1288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD RICKS-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Superintendent, Crowley County Correctional Facility, JASON LENGERICH, Warden, Buena Vista Correctional Facility, CHRISTINE STURGEON, Nurse Practitioner, Buena Vista Correctional Facility and others
Lewis et al v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis, Casper Ingram, Jr, Jesus Molina and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma County Jail, Oklahoma County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. USA
as 6:2013cv00141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Keith Irving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Irving v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00830
Movant:
Michael R Irving
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
