Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Isham v. Stephens County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Pete Isham
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaczkiewicz v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Michael Zaczkiewicz
Defendant:
Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel J. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Johnson v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Johnson
Defendant:
Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel L. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Nelson v. Gunnison County et al
as 1:2020cv02277
Defendant:
Gunnison County, Wesley Hersberger, Craig Isham and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isham v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv02087
Defendant:
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Isham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Gunnison County Court et al
as 1:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson and Brett Andrew of the House of Nelson
Defendant:
Wesley Hershberger, Craig Isham, Joshua Daugherety and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Hindes et al
as 1:2018cv02931
Defendant:
Craig Isham, Josh Daughtery, Ashley Bergemeister and others
Plaintiff:
Brett A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Isham et al v. 3M Company
as 5:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Moses Isham and Kayce Isham
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
