Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Issa Beiruti v. Corrections Corporation of Ame, et al
as 12-15088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISSA SANAD BEIRUTI
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND ITS OFFICERS, J. E. SUGRUE, Warden, L. L. LOPEZ, Facility Grievance Officer and others
Issa Sanad Beiruti v. United State
as 10-2380
Petitioner:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Respondent:
United States of America
Issa Sanad Beiruti v. United States
as 09-3108
Petitioner - Appellant:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Issa Sanad Beiruti v. Unknown Names United States Marshals et al
as 5:2009cv01348
Plaintiff:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Defendant:
Unknown Names United States Marshals, Unknown Names United States Marshals, Unknown Names United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Beiruti v. Unknown Names Unites States Marshals et al
as 1:2009cv01194
Plaintiff:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Defendant:
Unknown Names Unites States Marshals, Unknown Names Unites States Marshals, Unknown Names Unites States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beiruti v. Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers et al
as 1:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers, Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers, Corrections Corporation of America and its Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beiruti v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2009cv01232
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Beiruti v. Sugrue
as 1:2009cv00360
Petitioner:
Issa Sanad Beiruti
Respondent:
J.E. Sugrue, J.E. Sugrue and J.E. Sugrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
