Cases 11 - 20 of 45
(PC)Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al
as 2:2020cv02326
Defendant:
Elizabeth Stark, Christian Pfeiffer, S. Rosales and others
Plaintiff:
Edward N. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Aguirre Morgado v. William Barr
as 20-73316
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO J. AGUIRRE MORGADO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Michael Aguirre v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
as 20-55487
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. AGUIRRE
Michael Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulato, et al
as 20-55177
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and DOES, 1 to 10, inclusive
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. AGUIRRE
Michael Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulato, et al
as 20-55179
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and DOES, 1 to 10, inclusive
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. AGUIRRE
Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al
as 3:2019cv01102
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Aguirre
Defendant:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi
Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al
as 3:2019cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Aguirre
Defendant:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi
Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al
as 3:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Aguirre
Defendant:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi
(PC) Villines v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv00218
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, Zapata, T. Vang and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Wayne Villines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Murphy v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Zapata, Officer R. Rodriguez, P. Amobi and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Wayne Villines and John Paul Jones Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
