Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PERONE v. ELLIS et al
as 5:2018cv04345
Plaintiff:
WESLEY DAVID PERONE
Defendant:
CHADBOURNE J. ELLIS and OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamgotchai, et al v. State Horse Racing Commission et al
as 1:2016cv02035
Defendant:
State Horse Racing Commission, Thomas Chuckas, Jr. , Russell C. Redding and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jamgotchian and Eric Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv07111
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROCKETT
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, PASQUALE T. DEON, SR., JAMES C. SCHWARTZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50727
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J ELLIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ELLIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52002
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. ELLIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ELLIS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2011cv05699
Plaintiff:
GLENN A. ELLIS
Defendant:
AMANDA J. ELLIS , RICHARD YANCY , SUSAN YANCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
CROCKETT V. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv04008
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, SEPTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS, SEPTA MANAGERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROCKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Haymon-Peynado v. Ellis et al
as 1:2011cv01103
Plaintiff:
Naja J. Haymon-Peynado
Defendant:
Daniel J. Ellis, Scott James, Debbie Loucks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Lowe's Home Center(s)
as 4:2011cv00684
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Ellis
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Center(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
